HATX GP40 416

[Daniel G]

Would this repaint be possible? It's very interesting looking loco.
Anyone willing to paint it? Thanks!
http://www.rr-fallenflags.org/helm/hatx416aci.jpg
Photo from Fallen Flags.

[jay611]

I dont see anything interesting about it. Just a rusted rent-a-wreck showing clear signs of CSX Heritage.

Cheers,

Jason Underwood
Newport News, Virginia
CSX Peninsula Sub MP.16
Jay611@cox.net
http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y220/jay611/ESHR_Sig.jpg

[wyatt]

Hey Daniel, good to see you still around. The Heilman Family Locomotive works could probably do it! Come sign up! Link is in sig.

Wyatt Heilman
President and Founder of The Heilman Family Locomotive Works

http://wyattheilman.proboards101.com

Sometimes, if you work and believe hard enough, God cuts you a break.
-Author Unknown

[Daniel G]

Have you seen any ex-CSX leasers on MSTS? I haven't seen anything like it done on MSTS(Freeware anyway, I think Dekosoft had one). I thought it would be an interesting and different addition to any CSX consist. EDIT: Wyatt, I'll check out the site and thanks for the feedback. I don't have internet so I'm not on as much as I used to be.

[inflammable]

This is taken from that pesky 'Legal Stuff' page on Mr. Elwood's site:

Photo Links

February 7, 2002

Search engines can display "thumbnails," but not full-sized images of copyrighted works on their Web sites, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Wednesday.

Setting parameters for copyright infringement on the Internet, the court found that reproducing photographs to create thumbnail images is a fair use of the material, but displaying full-sized images violates the copyright owner's exclusive right to publicly display his works.

But the court found that displaying the full-sized images through linking and framing was not transformative and harmed the market for the original photographs.

"While it was necessary to provide whole images to suit Arriba's purpose of giving users access to the full-sized images without having to go to another site, such a purpose is not legitimate," Judge Thomas Nelson wrote. The 9th Circuit sent the case back to the district court to determine damages for copyright infringement and whether an injunction is necessary.

"This is a fascinating case," said Annette Hurst, a partner at Howard, Rice, Nemerovski, Canady, Falk & Rabkin in San Francisco. "It's basically going to do away with linking or framing without permission."

Important part:

The above ruling means that you must have permission to link to image files on my site. If you request permission to link to a photo(s) on mu site, I will forward your request to the person who submitted the image.

End of Important part.

James

[CSXT601]

we could always use leasers