I agree, I didn’t really mean to say that you understood.
Here the role of subjective perception plays a little more. I did not say that the desire of people to fly into space is bad.
More specifically, I would like to see automation for such test flights so that we can be sure that we will not lose a single crew member 100 percent.
Second: I am very fond of all the achievements of medicine, physics, astrophysics, propulsion engineering, aerodynamics, and other things (not directly about all, but about many), and yes, it's really great. Although most of them could be achieved by the same teams of incredibly smart and talented people and without the cost of space. Although, chance played a role here. As with many other inventions and breakthroughs, which were originally conceived as something completely different.
I understand your indignation at my "supposedly narrow outlook".
Taking into account the fact that you did not understand my idea.
I repeat: I am not against people who want to fly to the moon, to other planets, to other galaxies. I am opposed to conducting tests with living people in the era of supposedly high technologies. And the fact that there is still a lot of garbage, with which no one has figured out not that in orbit, but right here, under our feet, is not even worth mentioning.
Trying to fly away from here looks like a solution to a problem for teens: I don't want to clean my room, so I'll just leave.
Globally, I also meant that humanity has not yet matured either morally or technically in order to think about moving to Mars, because all projects of this company look like a stage of development towards the main goal.
And further. What modern robotic systems cannot cope with, what can humans cope with?
I don't see the point here at all. To rule? All these missions do not require passing the Turing test and highly artistic things. It is possible to collect and interpret information from the Earth